检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王伟[1] 王硕 Wang Wei;Wang Shuo(International Finance Institute,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036,China;Shenyang Huanggu District Finance Bureau of Liaoning Province,Shenyang 110032,China)
机构地区:[1]辽宁大学国际金融研究所,辽宁沈阳110036 [2]辽宁省沈阳市皇姑区财政局,辽宁沈阳110032
出 处:《创新科技》2023年第3期35-49,共15页Innovation science and technology
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目“新发展格局下政策性金融支持高水平科技自立自强体制机制研究”(22AJY017)。
摘 要:构建政策性科技金融发展评价指标体系,运用耦合协调度模型对政策性科技金融有效性进行实证分析。主要研究结论:我国政策性科技金融有效性还有很大的提升空间,政策性科技金融发展得分偏低,尚存在亟须破解的难点;科技创新与政策性科技金融的协调程度处于中等水平,二者没有实现全面协调发展;市场科技金融与政策性科技金融的协调程度同样不高,彼此存在着一定的相互替代而非互补的情况。但在研究时段内,政策性科技金融有效性表现出较大的增长潜力,不论是政策性科技金融的自身发展分数,还是与科技创新和市场科技金融耦合协调度分数都有明显上升趋势。因此,需要从提升供给质量、因地制宜高质量发展、与市场科技金融良性互动等方面,有针对性地进一步提升政策性科技金融有效性。As a series of inclusive and policy-based financial institutional arrangements and guiding actions taken by the government to solve the problem of financial market failure in the development of the science and technology industry,the policy-based Sci-Tech finance plays an irreplaceable role in Sci-Tech financial system and Sci-Tech innovation activities.Constructing the development evaluation index system of the policy-based Sci-Tech finance and empirically studying its effectiveness can not only promote the ability level of the policy-based Sci-Tech financial service Sci-Tech innovation entity economy,especially the small and medium-sized enterprises of Sci-Tech,but also support the high-level Sci-Tech self-reliance more effectively.The framework of this paper is as follows.Firstly,the policy-based Sci-Tech finance index system is designed and constructed from four dimensions,including policy-based Sci-Tech loan index,policy-based venture capital index,policy-based Sci-Tech insurance index,the policybased Sci-Tech finance environment index and 15 evaluation indexes.Secondly,the effectiveness and coordination degree of policy-based Sci-Tech finance in China are empirically tested based on the coupling degree model.Finally,the main conclusion are:①there is still much room to improve the effectiveness of China's policy-based Sci-Tech finance.On the whole,its development score is low,both the overall scale of financial support and the specific support effect are insufficient,and there are still difficulties to be solved.②The relationship between Sci-Tech innovation and policy-based Sci-Tech finance is still at a medium level,and they have not achieved very coordinated development.The score and contribution of Sci-Tech innovation are higher than that of policy-based Sci-Tech finance,which means that policy-based Sci-Tech finance can not fully support Sci-Tech innovation and its effectiveness needs to be strengthened.③The coordination between market Sci-Tech finance and policy-based Sci-Tech finance is also not
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117