日本东洋史学的双重性问题初探  

A Preliminary Study on the Duality of Japanese Oriental Historiography and Its Causes

作　　者：王广生 严绍璗[2] Wang Guangsheng;Yan Shaodang

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学 [2]北京大学

出　　处：《国际汉学》2023年第1期55-61,156,157,共9页International Sinology

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“多卷本《中国文化域外传播百年史(1807-1949)》”(项目批准号:17ZDA195)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：截至目前,学界对日本东洋史学发展过程中殖民主义、国家主义等问题的讨论,多在知识论和学术史层面展开,主张这是日本近代史学发展中的挫折或变异。若在历史哲学的视域中,作为西方近代学术思想之赓续,日本东洋史学与生俱来即带有双重性品格,即“科学性”和“人文性”。“科学性”主要指其所依凭的理性思维和实证主义思想,而“人文性”主要指宗教意识和情感、民族国家主义立场以及文学审美等要素。本文以白鸟库吉和津田左右吉的史学为例,分析其双重性表征的同时,尝试探讨日本东洋史学双重性的根源及局限。From the perspective of the philosophy of history, Japanese oriental historiography, as a part of modern Western academic thought, was born with a dual character: scientific and humanistic. The former refers to the rational and positivist thinking on which it is based, while the latter refers to the irrational thinking in historiography, such as aesthetic experience and nationalist positions. Taking the studies of Shiratori Kuakichi and Tsuda Sōkichi as examples, this paper analyzes the representations and the historical roots and limitations of their historiographical duality.

关 键 词：历史哲学 日本东洋史学 史学双重性 白鸟库吉 津田左右吉 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]