输血感染侵权责任的因果关系推定规则研究  

Study on Causality Presumption of Tort Liability of Transfusion Infection

作　　者：秦远 Qin Yuan

机构地区：[1]北京理工大学法学院

出　　处：《医学与法学》2023年第2期68-74,共7页Medicine and Jurisprudence

摘　　要：就输血感染侵权责任中的因果关系认定困难问题,法律规定并未给出明确的解决方法;司法实务中的具体认定情况则表明,传统的因果关系认定规则并不能解决该类侵权责任的证明困境,而因果关系推定规则才是输血感染侵权责任的必然选择;且从比较法角度言,因果关系推定规则较域外其他认定规则更有优势,也更加适应我国的法律土壤。故从立法角度与司法实践层面,都应推进因果关系推定规则的立法进程,进一步客观化输血感染侵权所依据的经验法则盖然性,发挥指导案例的司法指引作用,以破解当下的困境。The laws and regulations do not provide a clear solution to the difficulty in determining causality in tort liability of transfusion infection.The specific determination in judicial practice shows that the traditional rules of causality determination cannot solve the dilemma of proving tort liability,and the rules of causality presumption is the inevitable choice of tort liability for transfusion infection.From the perspective of comparative law,the rule of presumption of causality has more advantages than other rules and is more suitable in China.Therefore,from the per⁃spective of legislation and judicial practice,we should promote the legislative process of causality presumption rule,further objectize the probability of the empirical rule based on the infringement of transfusion infection,and give play to the judicial guidance role of guiding cases to solve the current dilemma.

关 键 词：输血感染 因果关系 因果关系推定规则 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]