蜀汉尚书令陈祗“踣国”辨正——兼论《三国志·董允传附陈祗传》编次思想  

An Analysis on Chen Zhi’s“Subverting the Country”:Also on Editing Thought in Sanguo Zhi·Chen Zhi Zhuan Attached to Dong Yun Zhuan

作　　者：李梓豪 王海 LI Zi-hao;WANG Hai(School of History and Culture,Bohai University,Jinzhou 121013,China)

机构地区：[1]渤海大学历史文化学院,辽宁锦州121013

出　　处：《湖北文理学院学报》2023年第3期11-17,共7页Journal of Hubei University of Arts and Science

基　　金：辽宁省经济社会发展研究课题(2023lslytkt-005)。

摘　　要：陈祗曾以侍中守尚书令的身份,成为蜀汉政权后期运转体系中的重要一员。传世文献对其述评存有分歧。《华阳国志》《通鉴》将黄皓“操弄威柄,终至覆国”录于陈祗生前,《通鉴》说其“巧佞”“阿意迎合”,成为后世诸多负面评价的史源。然而,《三国志》有关陈祗“表里”“媚兹一人”的记载并非贬义,其史学形象在后世发生明显流变。刘禅“自摄国事”背景下,陈祗取得“媚兹一人”般的信任,发挥协同“表里”的作用,对“诸葛之成规”乃至蜀汉政权的存续意义重大。或出于“为尊者讳”,陈寿在《三国志》中以黄皓行为掩饰刘禅之过,未点明蜀汉政局衰败的根源;又以似不合常理的《董允传附陈祗传》编次,向后人隐晦传达上述内容。As a chief imperial secretary of the kingdom of Han,Chen Zhi became an important member of the state machinery.The existing literatures express different ideas on Chi Zhi.In Hua Yang Guo Zhi and Hisrory as a Mirror,Huang Hao’s subverting the country was recorded before the birth of Chen Zhi.In Hisrory as a Mirror,Chen Zhi was described as a person good at flattery,which resulted in much negative assessment in later times.In the History of the Three Kingdoms,the records on Chen Zhi’s exclusive trust from the emperor are not derogatory,and his image has changed significantly.At the same time,the exclusive trust gives full play to the survival of“Zhuge Liang’s Rules”and even The Kingdom of Han.In the History of the Three Kingdoms,Chen Shou covered up Liu Shan’s faults with Huang Hao’s.Moreover,he implicitly conveyed it resorting to the editing of Chen Zhi Zhuan Attached to Dong Yun Zhuan,which is illogical generally.

关 键 词：陈祗 踣国 《三国志》 编次思想 

分 类 号：K236.2[历史地理—历史学]