网络互怼的不礼貌策略及身份建构研究  

A Study on the Impoliteness Strategies and Identity Construction in Online Hudui Discourse

作　　者：白丽梅[1] 邵馨 BAI Limei;SHAO Xin(College of Foreign Languages&Literature,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou 730070,China)

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学外国语学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《浙江外国语学院学报》2022年第6期33-41,共9页Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University

基　　金：西北师范大学青年博士基金项目“网络公共空间语言暴力的社会语用生态研究”(2021QB-014)资助

摘　　要：“互怼”是交际者运用不同的话语形式和策略来冒犯对方,引起对方心理或情感上的不适的话语实践。本文基于Culpeper的不礼貌模式,以抖音评论中的121例互怼语料为研究对象,借助质性分析软件NVivo 12对网络互怼话语策略及身份建构展开分析。研究结果表明,网络互怼中的交际者在直接不礼貌策略、消极不礼貌策略、积极不礼貌策略和间接不礼貌策略下,主要使用言语攻击、嘲笑、将对方与负面因素相关联、辩驳、夸张和反讽这6种子策略,建构了自己作为事件评价者、知识传播者、热心建议者和忠实维护者的身份。本文探究了网络互怼话语策略与身份建构之间的关系,为人际语用学研究提供了一定的启示。Hudui(reciprocal jocular abuse)from the perspective of impoliteness refers to the speakers’intentional use of some discourse strategies to offend the hearer and cause displeasure on the part of the hearer.Based on Culpeper’s impolite model,this paper collects 121 cases of impolite reciprocal jocular abuse through the social platform of short videos Douyin,and analyzes the impoliteness strategies and the identity construction of the speakers with the help of the qualitative analysis software NVivo 12.The results show that in online communication,verbal attack,mockery,association with negative factors,refutation,exaggeration and irony are the six sub-impoliteness strategies,which can be under the following four types of impoliteness strategies:bald on-record impoliteness,negative impoliteness,positive impoliteness,and off-record impoliteness.The speakers in hudui construct their identities as event evaluators,knowledge disseminators,enthusiastic advisors,and faithful defenders.This study can provide reference for the study of impolite discourse and enlightenment for the study of interpersonal pragmatics.

关 键 词：不礼貌模式 互怼 不礼貌策略 身份建构 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]