检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵宇翔[1] 张妍[2] 夏翠娟 刘炜[4] ZHAO Yuxiang;ZHANG Yan;XIA Cuijuan;LIU Wei
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学经济管理学院,江苏南京210094 [2]南京大学数据智能与交叉创新实验室,江苏南京210023 [3]上海图书馆研究员,中国人民大学信息资源管理学院,上海200031 [4]上海图书馆,上海200031
出 处:《中国图书馆学报》2023年第1期99-117,共19页Journal of Library Science in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目“公共文化服务领域开放数据的价值共创机制及实现模式研究”(编号:72074112)的研究成果。
摘 要:在公共文化服务领域,展览馆、图书馆、档案馆、博物馆(GLAM)等文化记忆机构在数字化转型和升级的进程中存在原始文化资源体量庞大、结构复杂、互操作性弱等问题。为了充分挖掘文化大数据的潜在价值,文化记忆机构开始开放和共享数据,并借助公众智慧实现价值共创和协同创新。本文首先对价值共创的概念演化进行溯源,并对GLAM价值共创的概念进行界定;其次,从资源整合、机构融合、用户服务三个层面,系统梳理数字人文视域下GLAM机构价值共创研究的相关主题;再次,探索当前文化记忆机构价值共创的主要实践模式,包括数据驱动型、平台驱动型、社区驱动型三种;最后,从GLAM价值共创模型的情境化构建、数字人文视域下价值共创的赋能探索以及评价体系构建三个方面对未来研究进行展望,以期为未来数字人文视域下的价值共创相关理论研究与实践创新提供参考。图5。表2。参考文献97。With the development of big data and the popularization of digital technology,data-intensive research paradigms have gradually penetrated into the humanities.An increasing number of knowledge service institutions have carried out digital humanities-oriented research.In the field of public cultural services,cultural memory institutions found that primitive cultural resources had problems such as huge volumes and complex structures during the process of migration and transformation to digital communities.In order to fully uncover the potential value of cultural big data,with the help of crowd wisdom,cultural memory institutions began to open and share data,which achieves value co-creation and collaborative innovation.The purpose of this paper is to review current research and the value co-creation in GLAM.Firstly,this paper reviewed the conceptual development of value co-creation,and defined the meaning of value co-creation in GLAM.Secondly,three related themes regarding value co-creation in GLAM,including the integration of cultural heritage resources,the convergence of cultural memory institutions,and the innovation in user services,were identified based on the perspective of digital humanities.Thirdly,this paper explored three types of current practical modes of value co-creation in cultural memory institutions,i.e.,data-driven,platform-driven,and community-driven.This paper provides a frontier outlook to examine the domain characteristics and value empowerment of value co-creation from the perspective of digital humanities.Further research should be carried out to contextually establish the value co-creation theoretical model and construct an evaluation system.The research findings are of great significance for clarifying the development context of value co-creation theory,understanding the current research status of value co-creation in cultural memory institutions,and providing reference for the related practices of value co-creation under the vision of digital humanities.5 figs.2 tabs.97 refs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117