检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴胜 黄和瑞 焦宪国 徐鹏 曾祥霖 WU Sheng;HUANG Herui;JIAO Xianguo;XU Peng;ZENG Xianglin(Huoshaopu Coal Preparation Plant,Guizhou Panjiang Clean Coal Co.Ltd.,Panzhou 553539,China)
机构地区:[1]贵州盘江精煤股份有限公司火烧铺矿选煤厂,贵州盘州553539
出 处:《选煤技术》2022年第6期76-80,共5页Coal Preparation Technology
摘 要:为了提高煤泥水处理效果,火烧铺矿选煤厂通过实验室对比试验和工业性试验对有机混凝剂(二甲基二烯丙基氯化铵)与原用凝聚剂(硫酸铝)的应用效果进行了对比研究。结果表明:采用有机混凝剂处理煤泥水具有处理量大、煤泥滤饼水分低、循环水清澈、能耗低、药剂单耗低的优点,有机混凝剂的用量仅为原用凝聚剂的8.3%,使吨煤泥加工费降低了2.77元。有机混凝剂处理煤泥水可节约生产成本,降低职工劳动强度,符合当前绿色矿山建设主题。For attaining a better coal slurry water treatment result,comparative test is conducted by Huoshaopu Coal Preparation Plant on the effects that can be obtained with the respective use of the coagulant(dimenthyldiallylammonium chloride)and the flocculating agent alluminium sulfate originally used,through bench-scale comparative test and industrial test.Test results show that the use of the former agent offers a series of advantages over the latter,such as higher treating capacity,lower moisture of filter cake,clearer circulating water,lower energy consumption and lower unit consumption of agent;the cost incurred for treating per ton of slime can be reduced by 2.77 yuan for less dosage of the agent is required(only 8.3 percent of the formerly used flocculating agent);moreover its use can lead to reduction of operating cost and ease of labor intensity,and is in keeping with the aspirations nowadays for building a green coal industry.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117