数据权利界定的路径  

The Path of Data Right Definition

作　　者：易继明[1] 钱子瑜 YI Jiming;QIAN Ziyu

机构地区：[1]北京大学国际知识产权研究中心,北京100871 [2]对外经济贸易大学法学院,北京100029

出　　处：《学习与实践》2023年第3期23-32,共10页Study and Practice

摘　　要：数字经济时代,数据成为一种高价值的新型财产,但数据权利的界定仍显模糊。传统版权模式下的数据库权对于作为内容的具体数据保护相对有限,虽然立法成本较低,但其难以满足数字经济的需求。对于新型数据财产权的分析与证成,意义在于明确数据的财产属性,构建数据权利的基本框架,但在制度层面上并非广义的数据都需要获得类型化、产权化保护,权利客体宜适当限缩。知识产权模式下的数据信息权客体限定为结构化数据,主体为对原始数据合法收集、合法加工的自然人、法人及其他组织,数据信息权的效力既及于作为整体的数据集合,也及于构成数据集合的具体数据,同时数据信息权还受到合理使用、强制许可等方面的限制,是兼顾保护强度与制度成本的选择。In the era of digital economy, data has become a new type of property with high value, but the definition of data rights is still vague. The database right under the traditional copyright mode is relatively limited for the protection of specific data as content. Although the legislative cost is low, it is difficult to meet the needs of the digital economy. As for the analysis and construction of the new type of data property right,the significance lies in clarifying the property attributes of data and constructing the basic framework of data rights. However, not all generalized data need to be protected at the institutional level, the object of data right should be appropriately limited. For the data information right under the intellectual property mode, its object is limited to structured data, and the subjects are natural persons, legal persons and other organizations that legally collect and process the original data. The validity of the data information right covers both the data set as a whole and the specific data that constitutes the data set. Meanwhile, the data information right is also subject to the restrictions of fair use, compulsory license, and other aspects. It is the choice of both protection intensity and system cost.

关 键 词：数据 数据保护 数据财产权 数据信息权 权利界定 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]