对环境权入宪问题的省思和质疑  

Reflections and Questions for Addition of Environmental Right into the Constitution

作　　者：丁宁 DING Ning(School of Law,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China)

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学法学院,北京100191

出　　处：《宜宾学院学报》2023年第3期30-36,81,共8页Journal of Yibin University

基　　金：国家社科重大研究专项“社会主义核心价值观融入生态文明法治建设的基本路径和法律样态研究”(19VHJ016)。

摘　　要：早期学界对于环境权政治性意义的认知偏离和当下学界所表现出的宪法学和环境法学的分野,使得环境权入宪问题浮于理想化,忽略了现实境遇及入宪后所面临的现实问题。从环境权的权源、权利主体和权利内容上来看,环境权自身存在先天不足的问题。从环境权的权利性质和权利构造上来看,环境权难以在现有宪法基本权利体系中获得证成,环境权入宪并不具备现实可能性。就当前来看,对于环境权利保护的探讨应转向对现有环境法部门法体系框架内容的完善和补足,从而在环境法部门法体系视角下实现对环境立法质量和法效果的关注。The early scholars’ views have deviated from the recognition of the political significance of environmental right, and the differences between constitutional law and environmental jurisprudence as shown by the current scholars’ views have made the constitutionalization of environmental right idealized, ignoring the real situation and the real problems faced after the constitutionalization. From the viewpoint of the right source,subject and content of environmental right, there are immaturity problems in environmental right. From the viewpoint of the nature of the right and the structure of the right, environmental right does not hold in the existing constitutional basic rights system. There is no real possibility for environmental right to be included in the constitution. At present, the discussion on the protection of environmental right should turn to the improvement and supplementation of the content of the framework of the existing sectoral law system of environmental law, so as to realize the concern for the quality and legal effect of environmental legislation under this sectoral law system of environmental law.

关 键 词：环境权 宪法 基本权利 权利 

分 类 号：D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]