基本内涵、规制危机到转型路径——乌尔里希·布兰德“社会的自然关系”概念探析  

Basic Connotation,Regulatory Crisis to Transformation Pathway:Analysis on Ulrich Brand's Concept of“Society-Nature Relationship”

作　　者：张乐 顾沁怡 ZHANG Le;GU Qin-yi(School of Marxism,Jiangnan University,Wuxi,Jiangsu 214122,China)

机构地区：[1]江南大学马克思主义学院,江苏无锡214122

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2023年第2期28-33,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“绿色资本主义新动向及其批判研究”(21CKS055)。

摘　　要：面对当前亟待解决的生态难题,乌尔里希·布兰德在吸收马克思自然观、调节学派规制理论和葛兰西霸权理论的基础上,强调自然是以社会的方式生产与占有的,并从社会统治与政治统治的双重维度构建起“社会的自然关系”概念框架。在“社会的自然关系”架构下,布兰德批判性阐释了资本主义的规制危机以及作为危机应对方案的绿色资本主义的霸权逻辑,旨在实现社会生态转型。作为生态危机的一种分析视角,布兰德揭露了根植于北方国家“帝国式生活方式”的危害,虽因淡化资本主义内在矛盾而陷入转型动力不足的困境,但他对和谐公正的“社会的自然关系”的追求,有助于我们增强社会主义生态文明的制度自信,为中国引领全球社会生态转型提供时代理据。In the face of the current urgent ecological problems, Ulrich Brand, on the basis of absorbing Marx’s view of nature, the Regulation Theory of the Regulation School and Gramsci’s theory of hegemony, emphasized that nature is produced and possessed in a social way, and constructed a conceptual framework “society-nature relationship” from a dual-dimension of social domination and political domination. Brand then critically explained the regulatory crisis of capitalist production mode and the hegemonic logic of green capitalism as a response to this crisis in the framework of the “society-nature relationship”, aiming to achieve social-ecological transformation. As an analytical perspective on ecological crisis, Brand exposed the dangers of the “imperial mode of living” in northern states, although this analysis may fall into the predicament of insufficient transformational power due to the dilution of the inherent contradictions in capitalism. His pursuit of a harmonious and fair “social-nature relationship” will help us strengthen the institutional confidence of socialist ecological civilization, and provide a timely evidence for China to lead the global social-ecological transformation.

关 键 词：社会的自然关系 绿色资本主义 社会生态转型 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]