检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵志超[1,2] Shao Zhichao(Department of Law,Anhui Engineering University,Wuhu 241000,China;School of Marxism,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽工程大学法律系,安徽芜湖241000 [2]西南大学马克思主义学院,重庆400715
出 处:《黑河学院学报》2023年第3期19-22,共4页Journal of Heihe University
摘 要:经济法律行为是经济法主体为了防范和化解市场内部矛盾性运动产生的外溢性风险,而有意识实施的、能够产生经济法上效果的法律事实。经济法律行为理论的传统研究范式显现其薄弱方面:传统经济法律行为理论分析框架与实践相脱节;理论内容片面、单一、缺乏内部逻辑性;理论内容不全、配套体系缺乏。需要从债法理论的视域,以“债之构成”研究范式对经济法律行为理论进行逻辑重构。Economic legal act is a legal fact which is consciously implemented by the subject of economic law in order to prevent and resolve the spillover risk generated by the movement of internal contradictions in the market,and thus,can produce the effect of economic law.At present,the traditional research paradigm of economic legal act theory shows its weaknesses:the traditional theoretical analysis framework of economic legal act is disjoined from the practice;the theoretical content is one-sided and single without internal logic;theoretical content is incomplete without supporting system.Therefore,it is necessary to take logical construction on the theory of economic legal act from the perspective of the theory of debt law with the research paradigm of“the constitution of debt”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.3.240