医学科研诚信治理对策探讨——基于科技部通报的医学科研诚信案件分析  

Discussion on countermeasures of medical research integrity governance:Analysis of medical research integrity cases based on the notification of ministry of science and technology

作　　者：李允水 龚浩 周罗晶[2] Li Yunshui;Gong Hao;Zhou Luojing(Yangzhou University School of Public Health,Yangzhou 225009,Jiangsu Province,China;Department of Science and Technology,Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hospital,Yangzhou 225001,Jiangsu Province,China)

机构地区：[1]扬州大学公共卫生学院,225009 [2]江苏省苏北人民医院科技处,扬州225001

出　　处：《中华医学科研管理杂志》2023年第1期13-17,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management

摘　　要：目的通过研究科技部查处通报的医学科研诚信案件特征规律,探讨加强医学科研诚信治理的对策。方法以2021年6月至2022年5月国家科技部公开通报的20批次555例科研诚信案件调查处理结果通报为研究对象,对涉案论文情况、地区分布、科研失信行为以及惩戒措施等进行分类统计。结果数据造假为最常见的科研失信问题,占47.39%。山东省为通报案例最多的省份,占50.81%。27.67%的通讯作者受到5项惩戒措施,26.28%的第一作者受到6项惩戒措施,惩戒措施中,停报各项科研项目的比例最高,通讯作者和第一作者受到此项惩戒分别占87.60%和91.42%,停报年限为5年的通讯作者占全部年限的49.24%,第一作者占57.48%。结论推动医学科研诚信治理要加强医学期刊监督、促进地区交流,鼓励主动纠错,完善科研诚信数据库建设。Objective To study the characteristics and patterns of medical research integrity cases reported by the Ministry of Science and Technology,and to explore the countermeasures to strengthen the management of medical research integrity.Methods 20 batches of 555 cases of scientific research integrity cases publicly reported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China from June 2021 to May 2022 were taken as the research objects,and the papers involved,regional distribution,scientific research dishonesty and disciplinary measures were classified and analyzed.Results Data falsification was the most common problem of scientific research dishonesty,accounting for 47.39%.Shandong Province was the province with the most reported cases,accounting for 50.81%.27.67%of the corresponding authors received 5 disciplinary measures,and 26.28%of the first authors received 6 disciplinary measures.Among the disciplinary measures,the proportion of suspension of applications for various scientific research projects was the highest,with 87.60%of corresponding authors and 91.42%of first authors receiving this punishment.The corresponing authors with 5 years suspension accounted for 49.24%of all years,and the first authors accounted for 57.48%.Conclusions To promote the integrity governance of medical research,we should strengthen the supervision of medical journals,promote regional exchanges,encourage active error correction,and improve the construction of scientific research integrity database.

关 键 词：科研诚信 治理 科研诚信案件 惩戒措施 科技部 

分 类 号：R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]