检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏志鹏 李军[1] 李牧原 盛杰 王燕[1] WEI Zhipeng;LI Jun;LI Muyuan;SHENG Jie;WANG Yan(School of Civil Engineering,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266033,Shandong,China;Shanghai Lianchuang Design Group Co.,Ltd.Qingdao Branch,Qingdao 266033,Shandong,China;Binzhou Construction Drawing Review Center,Binzhou 256600,Shandong,China)
机构地区:[1]青岛理工大学土木工程学院,山东青岛266033 [2]上海联创设计集团股份有限公司青岛分公司,山东青岛266033 [3]滨州建筑工程施工图审查中心,山东滨州256600
出 处:《建筑科学与工程学报》2023年第2期59-68,共10页Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering
基 金:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0703506)。
摘 要:为了减轻节点自重同时提高结构美观性,有必要开展新型木网壳节点连接形式研究。以已提出的新型K6网壳销式连接节点作为原始方案,进行2次改进。通过轴压性能试验确定改进方案1的有效性后,对改进节点进行抗弯性能试验。在此基础上提出改进方案2,并采用有限元分析的方法研究因试验条件受限导致的难以同时施加轴压力和竖向荷载的问题。结果表明:改进方案1受安装偏差影响较小,其实际承载力未像原始方案那样低于预期承载力设计值;节点中的异型钢连接件自重较目前应用较多的网壳节点轻20%~50%,在轴压性能试验中具有较好的弹性变形性能,抗弯性能试验中具有一定的塑性变形性能;改进方案2节点在轴压和竖向荷载共同作用时的受力性能明显优于竖向荷载单独作用时,说明轴压力对节点抗弯承载力有利;改进方案2节点抗弯承载力较改进方案1更有优势,经数据优化后提出的钢板厚度建议可为工程设计提供参考。In order to reduce the self-weight of joints and improve the aesthetics of structures,it is necessary to carry out the research on the new connection form of reticulated timber shell joints.The new pin connection for K6 reticulated shell was taken as the original scheme,and the scheme was improved twice.After the effectiveness of the improved scheme 1 was determined by the axial compression performance test,the flexural performance test of the improved joint was carried out.On the basis,the improved scheme 2 was proposed,and the finite element analysis method was used to research the problem that it was difficult to apply axial pressure and vertical load at the same time due to the limited test conditions.The results show that the improved scheme 1 is less affected by the installation deviation,and its actual bearing capacity is not lower than the expected design value as the original scheme.The self-weight of the special-shaped steel connector in this joint is 20%-50%lighter than that of the reticulated shell joint,which is widely used at present.It has good elastic deformation performance in the axial compression performance test and certain plastic deformation performance in the flexural performance test.The joint mechanical performance of the improved scheme 2 under the combined action of axial compression and vertical load is obviously better than that under the single action of vertical load,which illustrates that the axial pressure is beneficial to the flexural capacity of the joint.The flexural capacity of the joint of improved scheme 2 is more advantageous than that of improved scheme 1.The steel plate thickness suggestion put forward after data optimization can provide reference for the engineering design.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49