检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳大学法学院,深圳518000
出 处:《上海市经济管理干部学院学报》2023年第2期48-53,共6页Journal of Shanghai Economic Management College
摘 要:公司为股权受让人提供担保,有受到操纵和引起债权人权利实现可能性不当减损的风险,并有损公平价值。通过检索、归纳并分析判例观点发现,既有规范无法解答公司为股权受让人提供担保行为的效力问题。应当客观评价既有规范下公司为股权受让人提供担保行为的合法性与正当性,充分考虑股东、公司、债权人之间的利益冲突和平衡,将公平价值放在更加重要的位置,并基于此对公司为股权受让人提供担保予以效力性强制性规范意义上的禁止。When a company provides a guarantee for the equity transferee,there is a risk of manipulation and improper impairment of the possibility of the realization of the creditor’s rights,which is detrimental to the fair value.Retrieving,summarizing and analyzing the opinions of precedents,it is found that the existing norms cannot answer the question of the validity of the guarantee provided by the company to the equity transferee.We should objectively evaluate the legality and legitimacy of the company’s act of providing guarantees for equity transferees under the existing norms,fully consider the conflict of interests and balance between shareholders,companies,and creditors,put fair value in a more important position,and based on this prohibits the company from providing guarantees for equity transferees in the sense of effective mandatory norms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.198.162