检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王鹏飞 黄忠[2] WANG Pengfei;HUANG Zhong
机构地区:[1]天津师范大学历史文化学院,天津300387 [2]河北工业大学外国语学院,天津300401
出 处:《北华大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第6期38-46,151,共10页Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)
基 金:天津市社会科学一般项目“中日‘1972年体制’的历史考察及现实意义”(TJSL20-002)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:冷战时期,美国通过驻军与防卫协定为日、韩两国提供安全保障,试图在东亚构建美日韩三边军事同盟,干涉地区事务。但日、韩两国因历史问题与领土争端,双边关系改善举步维艰,导致美日韩仅形成以“美日同盟”和“美韩同盟”为长边、以日韩“准同盟”关系为短边的三边合作体制。准同盟视角下的日韩安保合作是在共同外部威胁与美国的强力弥合下促成的战术性合作,缺乏制度保障,无法实现战略性合作。两国在冷战时期的不同阶段根据各自利益不断调整双边安保合作的尺度。冷战后,两国利益呈现多元化,对于东亚地区安全威胁的不同认知深刻影响着美日韩三边安保合作体制。During the Cold War,the U. S. provided security for Japan and South Korea through militaryand defense agreements,attempting to build a trilateral military alliance among the U. S. ,Japan andSouth Korea in East Asia and intervening in regional affairs. However,Japan and South Korea have struggledto improve bilateral relations due to historical issues and territorial disputes. Security cooperation betweenJapan and South Korea under the quasi-alliance perspective was a tactical cooperation facilitated bycommon external threats and strong U. S. bridging,but lacked institutional safeguards to insure their strategiccooperation. The two countries continuously adjusted the scale of bilateral security cooperation accordingto their respective interests at different stages of the Cold War. After the Cold War,the interests ofthe two countries became more diversified,and the different perceptions of security threats in East Asiahave profoundly affected the U. S. -Japan-South Korea trilateral security cooperation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145