无过错责任中的过失相抵规则适用--以《民法典》第1173条的解释为中心  

Research on the Practice of the Rule of Comparative Negligence in No-Fault Liability--From the Perspective of Systematic Interpretation of the Article 1173 of the Civil Code

作　　者：欧达婧 Ou Dajing

机构地区：[1]广东金融学院法学院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2023年第1期65-70,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：过失相抵规则适用的法律效果主要体现为行为人双方的责任分担,在无过错责任归责原则之下,应当使过失相抵规则适用于无过错责任领域。但是,在立法对行为人规定极严格责任的情形下,可以就特定无过错责任类型作出过失相抵规则不予适用的特殊规定。我国裁判实务中对于过失相抵案件的审判已经出现过错责任与无过错责任的类型化区分,但对于过失相抵规则具体适用的责任分担尚缺乏足够共识。The legal effect of the rule of comparative negligence is mainly reflected in the liability attribution of both parties.In No-Fault Liability,the responsibility sharing of both parties has different value measurement and consideration factors.However,under the circumstance that the legislation imposes very strict liability on the doer,special provisions can be made for certain types of no-fault liability that the fault offsetting rule does not apply.There is a typological distinction between fault liability and No-Fault liability in the judicial practice.But there are still some problems in the judicial trials,which is need to be settled.

关 键 词：过失相抵 与有过失 责任分担 民法典 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]