中国古代竞戏判例研究  

Research on Judicial Cases of Competitive Play in Ancient China

作　　者：戴羽 高海杰 刘青[1] DAI Yu;GAO Haijie;LIU Qing(Chengdu sport university,Chengdu Sichuan 610041;College of Physical Education,Shanxi Normal University,Taiyuan Shanxi 030031)

机构地区：[1]成都体育学院,四川成都610041 [2]山西师范大学体育学院,山西太原030031

出　　处：《成都体育学院学报》2023年第2期94-100,共7页Journal of Chengdu Sport University

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“我国古代法典、政书中体育史料的整理与研究”(2020M683640XB)。

摘　　要：中国古代司法文书中存在一定数量的竞渡、拳棒、相扑、射箭、踢毽等竞戏判例,唐宋竞渡判例主要作为吏部铨选判题与司法判决的参考,元代相扑、射箭判例可直接作为判决的法律依据,清代拳棒判例则具有补充与细化法律条文的功能。我国古代竞戏判例不仅拓展了古代体育史料的类型,同时证明我国古代存在体系化的竞技人身伤害治理措施。值得注意的是,清代踢毽判例所涉及的竞戏治理已达到法理探讨的深域。竞戏判例史料相较于其他史料更具真实性与普适性,只有当竞技活动形成一定规模,才会出现法律层面的治理措施,从这一层面来看,竞戏判例可与其他体育文献共同佐证古代体育的发展概貌。There were a number of judicial documents regarding competitive play in ancient China,such as boating,Wushu,sumo,archery,shuttlecock kicking,etc.The cases in Tang and Song dynasties were mainly used as references for official selection and judicial decisions.The cases of sumo and archery in the Yuan Dynasty could be directly used as the legal basis for judgments.The precedents of Wushu in the Qing Dynasty can supplement and refine the legal provisions.Judicial cases of competitive play in ancient China not only expanded the types of ancient sports historical materials,but also proved that there were systematic measures to control sports injury in ancient China.It is worth noting that the governance of competitive play involved shuttlecock cases in the Qing Dynasties had reached the depth of legal discussion.Compared with other historical materials,the historical documents of competitive play are more authentic and universe.Only when competitive activities reached a certain scale could there be legal governance measures.From this perspective,the judicial cases of competitive play and other sports literature reveal the general development of sports in ancient times.

关 键 词：体育史 竞戏判例 竞戏治理 

分 类 号：G80-054[文化科学—运动人体科学]