《裴务齐正字本〈刊谬补缺切韵〉》释义疏证举例  

Examples of the interpretation and proof of the Pei Wuqi Zheng Zi Ben Kan Miu Bu Que Qie Yun

作　　者：玄亚男 蔡梦麒[1] XUAN Ya-nan;CAI Meng-qi(Arts School,Hunan Normal University,Changsha Hunan,410081,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学文学院,湖南长沙410200

出　　处：《佛山科学技术学院学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期79-85,共7页Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“《刊谬补缺切韵》校释及唐五代韵书整理与研究”(18AYY014)。

摘　　要：王仁昫《刊谬补缺切韵》处于《切韵》向《广韵》的过渡时期,释义渐趋成熟的过程中,出现了三种释义不明的情况,需要辨析疏证:一是释义用字或字头讹误,二是文字脱漏,三是联绵词字形多变。对比《切韵》系各残卷及相关文献资料,进行疏证分析,可以让释义更合理、更明确可信。Wang Renxu’s Kan Miu Bu Que Qie Yun is in a period of transition from the Qie Yun to the Guang Yun,and while its interpretation is becoming more mature,there have three cases of unclear interpretation.It is necessary to differentiate and analyze the symptoms and signs:first,the words used in the interpretation or the prefix are wrong;second,the words are missing;and third,the form of Lianmian word(variable word forms)is changeable.By comparing the fragmented volumes and relevant literature of the“Qieyun”series,and making a sparse analysis,this paper makes the interpretation more reasonable,clear and credible.

关 键 词：刊谬补缺切韵 讹误 脱漏 释义 训诂 

分 类 号：H162[语言文字—汉语]