个人信息转移权客体范围和实现方式的反思与修正  

Reflection and Revision on the Object Boundary and Realization Method of the Right to Information Portability

作　　者：文立彬 邹瑛 WEN Libin;ZOU Ying(School of Law and Sociology,Nanning Normal University,Nanning 530001,China;People’s Court of Haicheng District of Beihai,Beihai 536000,China)

机构地区：[1]南宁师范大学法学与社会学院,广西南宁530001 [2]北海市海城区人民法院,广西北海536000

出　　处：《重庆邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期53-62,共10页Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：广西哲学社会科学规划研究课题:基于广西司法大数据样本的个人信息犯罪刑事规制体系研究(22FFX013);广西教育科学“十四五”规划专项课题:新文科背景下双创法学人才培养与课程思政建设的融合与实践研究(2022ZJY2754);南宁师范大学本科课堂教学模式改革项目:数字经济视域下知识产权法智慧翻转课堂的教学改革与创新优化。

摘　　要：《个人信息保护法》确立了个人信息转移权,该权被赋予促进个人信息流通、打破数据平台垄断的期待。然而,作为新兴权利的个人信息转移权在实践中面临着客体范围模糊、操作性不强等主要问题,这导致个人信息转移权落地困难。在剖析困境成因、比较域外立法经验和反思实践成效的基础上,建议将直接数据和部分观察数据纳入个人信息转移权客体范畴,确定差异化数据传输要求,以期实现个人信息转移权的多重效能。The right of information portability has been established in the Personal Information Protection Law.Information portability is expected to promote the circulation of personal information and break the monopoly of data platforms.However,as a new right,the main problem of the right to information portability in practice is that the object scope is fuzzy and the operation is not strong.As a result,these issues have led to poor practice of the right to information portability.On the basis of analyzing the causes of the predicament,comparing foreign legislative experience and reflecting on the effectiveness of practice,we recommend that,first of all,direct data and partial observation data should be included in the scope of object of the right of information portability.Second,differentiated data transmission should be clarified.Finally,the multiple values of information portability will be realized.

关 键 词：《个人信息保护法》 个人信息转移权 客体范围 差异化数据传输 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]