检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡雪媛 HU Xue-yuan(College of Humanities and Law,Hefei University of Technology,23004l,Anhui,China)
出 处:《特区经济》2023年第2期106-109,共4页Special Zone Economy
摘 要:目前我国缺少有关平行进口商标侵权制度的明确规定,理论界在此问题上观点林立且均存有漏洞,而实践中各地法院对此问题处理结果不一,裁判思路和依据更是混乱。为进一步完善平行进口商标侵权制度,本文以《中华人民共和国商标法》立法目的为指引,回归商标的基本功能和根本属性,顺应社会主义市场经济的发展趋势,综合考虑消费者、商标权人和商标被许可人等各方价值利益,在该问题上进行了探究并提出了相关的立法建议,以请教于大家。at present,there is a lack of clear provisions on the parallel import trademark infringement system in China.There are many opinions and loopholes in the theoretical circle on this issue.In practice,the courts in different places have different results on this issue,and the judgment ideas and basis are even more confused.In order to further improve the parallel import trademark infringement system,this paper,guided by the legislative purpose of the Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China,returns to the basic functions and attributes of trademarks,conforms to the development trend of socialist market economy,and comprehensively considers the value interests of consumers,trademark owners and trademark licensees,This paper explores the issue and puts forward relevant legislative suggestions for your reference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49