农村公共政策的收入增长与分化效应研究  

Study on the Income Growth and Differentiation Effects of Rural Public Policies

作　　者：张萌[1,2] ZHANG Meng(School of Economics and Finance,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an Shaanxi 710061,China;School of Mathematics and Statistics,Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University,Xi'an Shaanxi 710100,China)

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学经济与金融学院,陕西西安710061 [2]陕西学前师范学院数学与统计学院,陕西西安710100

出　　处：《技术经济与管理研究》2023年第3期115-121,共7页Journal of Technical Economics & Management

摘　　要：文章构建包含农村公共政策与储蓄内生性的索洛—斯旺模型作为研究框架,提出“保障型”与“补助型”两类农村公共政策对于居民家庭收入增长与分化效应的理论假说,并以中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据样本进行实证检验。发现所有政策对于农村居民家庭收入都具有增长效应,农村基础设施建设、医疗保障等“保障型”政策对于家庭收入具有“促包容”效应,生产(生活)性财政补助、金融信用贷款等“补助型”政策对于家庭收入具有“促分化”效应。文章提出优化农村公共政策组合、营造和谐有序市场环境、完善农村居民收入二次分配机制等政策建议。This paper constructs a Solow-Swan model,which is endogenous to savings and embedded in rural public policies,as a research framework,and puts forward the theoretical hypothesis of the effects of two types of rural public policies,namely"guaranteed"and"subsidized",on the growth and differentiation of household income,and the theoretical hypothesis was tested by the China Household Tracking Survey(CFPS)data sample.The study shows that all policies have a growth effect on rural household income,however,"protection"policies such as rural infrastructure construction and medical care have a"pro-inclusion"effect on household inc-ome,while"subsidy"policies such as production(living)financial assistance and financial However,"subsidy-based"policies such as production(livelihood)subsidies and financial loans have a"pro-diversification"effect on household income.Therefore,the suggestions include optimizing the design and combination of rural public policies,creating a harmonious and orderly rural agricultural market environment,and improving the secondary distribution mechanism of rural residents'income are conducive.

关 键 词：共同富裕 农村公共政策 居民家庭收入 促包容 促分化 二次分配 

分 类 号：F224[经济管理—国民经济]