检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾文华 JIA Wenhua
出 处:《欧洲研究》2023年第1期36-63,I0003,共29页Chinese Journal of European Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点课题“中欧贸易与投资关系的跨学科研究”(项目批准号:21AGJ011)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:通过对自由政府间主义和新功能主义的有效通约,“失败的前进”分析框架创制了一个相对完整的宏大理论界域,本文据此对欧盟/欧共体EPC和CFSP框架内的75个域外制裁案进行了系统考察,认为欧盟相对有效的制度机制及制裁绩效,实际上经历了一个挫折不断的、渐进式发展的历程。欧盟未来面临的真正难题在于,如何克服作为CFSP构成部分的域外制裁与整体政策目标之间产生的内在冲突,即通过制裁追求“共同安全”的努力,往往导致了“共同的不安全”。By merging liberal-intergovernmentalism and neo-functionalism,the Failing-Forward-Framework(FFF)has created a grand theoretic boundary,based on which this article makes a comprehensive study of the 75 external sanction cases within EPC and CFSP and concludes that the EU’s relatively efficient regimes and satisfactory sanction effects have,in fact,experienced constant difficulties and setbacks.The practical challenge with which the EU is currently encountered is the inherent contradiction between the aim of the sanction regimes as an integral part of CFSP and the overall objective of CFSP designed to build a“common security system”while external sanctions has created,in reality,a“common insecurity environment”for both the member states and the other countries concerned.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7