论行政法中表见代理的法律后果  

The Legal Consequence of Apparent Agency in Administrative Law

作　　者：任沫蓉 Ren Morong(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2023年第2期158-167,共10页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金：2018年度国家社科基金项目“当事人选择行政纠纷解决途径的影响因素之实证研究”(项目批准号:18BFX043)。

摘　　要：房屋拆迁案件中误拆等行为主体的推定实质体现出表见代理的适用,显示出行政法领域对表见代理制度的现实需求,不过行政法中表见代理的法律后果应有别于民事领域。为了平衡公法秩序与相对人的信赖利益,行政法中应根据表见代理人不同的行为类型以及相对人的错误信赖程度,来确定代理有效抑或代理无效,但被代理行政机关需要承担信赖利益损害赔偿责任的法律后果,并在此基础上认定表见代理人行为的法律性质。基于表见代理人行为性质的最终认定结果,相对人可通过行政诉讼使得被代理行政机关承担相应的法律责任。The presumption of the subject of wrongful demolition in the case of house demolition reflects the application of apparent agency in essence,and shows the realistic demand of application of apparent agency in the field of administrative law.However,the legal consequences of apparent agency in administrative law should be different from those in civil law.Aiming to balance the order of public law and the trust interests of the counterparty,administrative law needs to determine whether the agent is valid or invalid based on the different types of the apparent agent's behavior and the degree of the counterparty's wrong trust,but the administrative agency shall bear the legal consequences of liability for reliance interest damage.And the result can help to confirm the effectiveness of the apparent agent's behavior.According to the final determination of the legal effect of the apparent agent's behavior,the counterparty can make the principal,which is the administrative agency,bear appropriate legal liabilities through administrative litigation.

关 键 词：行政委托 表见代理 法律后果 行政越权 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D925.3[政治法律—法学]