署名问题中灰色地带科研不端行为的防范与治理——基于撤销论文的分析  

Prevention and Treatment of Scientific Misconduct in the Gray Zone of the Authorship Issues--Analysis based on retracted papers

作　　者：冯凌子 杨晓 王立学[1] 任艳青 袁军鹏 FENG Ling-zi;YANG Xiao;WANG Li-xue;REN Yan-qing;YUAN Jun-peng(National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences;Department of Information Resources Management,School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院文献情报中心 [2]中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系

出　　处：《科学与社会》2023年第1期16-36,共21页Science and Society

基　　金：国家社会科学基金“中外同学科期刊跨遴选体系联合排序方法研究”(19BTQ090)。

摘　　要：在学术规范和科研不端之间,有一个复杂、有时甚至是困难的主观判断空间——灰色地带。灰色地带科研不端行为不易发现、不易认定也不易处理,是科研失信的“重灾区”之一,能够对科研诚信建设造成极大的阻碍。本研究探讨灰色地带不端行为的署名问题,利用撤销论文作为研究对象,通过设计“署名问题具体撤销原因分类”,深入分析因署名问题撤销论文的具体原因,发现授权同意、贡献分配与声明模糊是最常见的问题。基于对署名问题中存在的灰色地带的探索,本文进一步提出了防范与治理建议。Between academic norms and research misconduct,there is a complex and sometimes difficult judgment space-the gray zone.The research misconduct in the gray zone is not easy to find,identify and deal with.It is one of the"worst hit areas"of misconduct in scientific research,which has greatly hindered the construction of research integrity.This study discussed the authorship issues of misconduct in the gray zone and used the data of retracted papers to explore the specific reasons for the existing authorship issues.Through the design of the"specific retraction reason classification of the authorship issue",we found that authorization consent,contribution distribution and declaration ambiguity were the most common problems.Furthermore,we put forward prevention and governance suggestions based on the existing problems.

关 键 词：署名问题 撤销论文 科研不端 灰色地带科研不端行为 

分 类 号：G31[文化科学]