检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何紫薇 HE Ziwei(China NetcastingService Association,Beijing,100045,China)
出 处:《文化创新比较研究》2023年第2期64-67,共4页Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation
摘 要:近期,豆瓣评分因水军、粉丝控评等问题多次遭到网友诟病。在笔者看来,豆瓣评分的现状是其所处的时代、技术、市场、社会环境交叉作用的结果,外部力量的互相作用对豆瓣评分在文艺评论场域中的价值赋予了远超一个社交平台产品所能实现的功能外延,其背后所反映的正是新媒体语境下文艺评论场域中官方、专业、客观、理性的力量在大众传播层面的“失语”。豆瓣评分的“症结”不能仅通过平台迭代算法逻辑来解决,而是需要市场消除对豆瓣评分的不恰当定位及由此带来的过度依赖,同时,给予其他评价体系标准更多大众层面的传播空间。Recently,Douban score has been criticized by netizens for many times due to problems such as water army and fans'control.In the author's opinion,the current situation of Douban scoring is the result of the intersection of its era,technology,market and social environment.The interaction of external forces has given the value of Douban scoring in the field of literary and artistic criticism far more than a social platform product can achieve.What it reflects behind is the official,professional,objective the power of reason is"Aphasia"at the level of mass communication.The"Crux"of Douban scoring cannot be solved only through the logic of the platform iterative algorithm,but requires the market to eliminate the inappropriate positioning of Douban scoring and the resulting excessive dependence,and at the same time,give other evaluation system standards more public level communication space.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49