新世纪文学编年史书写的价值与意义  

The Value and Significance of Writing Literary Chronicles in the New Century

作　　者：顾玲玲[1] 李军辉[1] Gu Lingling;Li Junhui

机构地区：[1]信阳师范学院历史文化学院,信阳464000

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（中国现代、当代文学研究）》2022年第3期63-69,共7页MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY CHINESE LITERATURE

摘　　要：新世纪以来,实证性的文学史论著取代了阐释性的文学史论著,为中国现当代文学史的撰写注入了新的活力。确切地说,这种实证性的文学史论著主要指编年史的著史方式。一般来说,文学编年史无意参与到“遮蔽”与“反遮蔽”的逻辑争论中,它们以一种工具性的自我定位,试图对整个文学史或特定视野下的文学史做出相对全面的勾勒。这种勾勒并非毫无意义的资料拼贴,而是让文学史在历时性与共时性的维度呈现其本来面貌,进而通过这种方式隐匿地传达出编者的文学史观念。文学编年史的著史方式追求一种客观精神和求实精神,同时也反映了文学史研究从“以论代史”到“以史代论”的思想嬉变。Since the new century,empirical literary history works have replaced explanatory literary history works and injected new vitality into the writing of modern and contemporary Chinese literary history.To be exact,this kind of empirical literary history mainly refers to the way of writing chronicles.Generally speaking,literary chronicles have no intention of participating in the logical debate between"covering"and"anti-covering",and they try to make a relatively comprehensive outline of the whole literary history or the literary history in a specific field of vision by means of instrumental self-positioning.This kind of sketch is not a meaningless collage of materials,but makes the dimension of diachronic and synchronic literature history show its original appearance,and then secretly conveys the concept of literature history in this way.The way of writing literary chronicles pursues an objective spirit and realistic spirit,and at the same time reflects the ideological evolution of literary history research from"criticism substitutes for history"to"history substitutes for criticism".

关 键 词：文学编年史 实证主义 文学史 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]