蒙古问题之争:1920年代知识界对苏俄态度的分化  

Controversies over the Mongolia Issue:The Differentiation of the Intelligentsia's Attitudes towards Soviet Russia in the 1920s

作　　者：白冰 刘倩[3] Bai Bing;Liu Qian

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学历史学系,上海200062 [2]华东师范大学社会主义历史与文献研究院,上海200062 [3]重庆大学马克思主义学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（中国现代史）》2022年第1期133-144,共12页CONTEMPORARY HISTORY OF CHINA

基　　金：重庆市社会科学规划中特理论专项重点项目“网络空间治理视域下主流意识形态认同机制研究”(2016ZDZT06)。

摘　　要：蒙古问题因中俄交涉拖延不决渐由社会舆论之边缘视点而趋向知识界之中心视野。知识界之所以在对待苏俄问题上呈现出“友俄”“亲俄”“联俄”和“仇俄”之不同态度,苏俄对蒙古的意图和举措是最敏感、最直观的因素。各方对国家主权、世界革命、民族自决理论进行不同阐释与论争的同时,蒙古问题亦不断被上升至“革命”高度,并使之意识形态化。在中俄交涉的特殊困境时期,拥有革命色彩的“民族自决”与主权意识的“国家自决”的博奔交锋,使得蒙古问题从外交事件上升至政治纷争,并延伸至思想学术领域,对国家、民族和革命关系的理论认知与构建发生特殊影响。Mongolia issue gradually became a focus of the intelligentsia from the marginal perspective of public opinion because of the delayed Sino-Russian negotiation.The reason why the intelligentsia showed different attitudes towards Soviet Russia,such as"keeping friendship with Russia","closeness to Russia","alliance with Russia"and"hostile to Russia",was that Soviet Russia's intentions and measures towards Mongolia were the most sensitive and intuitive factor.As the factions explained and debated over"national sovereignty","world revolution"and"national self-determination"theory,Mongolia issue became highly revolutionary and political.In the special difficult time of Sino-Russian negotiation,the game confrontation between revolutionary"national self-determination"and sovereign conscious"state self-determination"made Mongolia issue rise from a diplomatic event to a political dispute and expanding to academic fields,having a special influence on the construction and theoretical cognition of the relationship between state,nation and revolution.

关 键 词：知识界 苏俄革命 蒙古问题 民族自决 

分 类 号：D829.512[政治法律—政治学]