检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙梦达 SUN Mengda(School of Economic Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200063)
出 处:《牡丹江大学学报》2023年第4期61-69,共9页Journal of Mudanjiang University
摘 要:生态环境修复是针对环境污染破坏而提供的司法救济,其目的是责令生态环境破坏者采取综合整治措施,以修复受到破坏的自然环境的功效与生态价值。实践中,生态环境修复责任的执行效果不佳是司法部门亟须解决的难题。探求我国生态环境修复执行行政权与司法权协同机制,应从分析生态环境修复执行的特殊性入手,进而对行政权协同司法权参与到生态环境修复执行中进行法理分析,通过法律解释完善现有的执行制度。Ecological restoration is a judicial remedy for environmental pollution damage,and the purpose is to order the ecological environment destroyer to take comprehensive remediation measures to restore the efficacy and ecological value of the damaged natural environment.In practice,the poor implementation of eco-environmental restoration responsibility is a difficult problem that needs to be solved by the judiciary.In order to explore the synergistic mechanism between administrative and judicial power in the implementation of ecological restoration in China,it should start from analyzing the special characteristics of ecological restoration implementation,and then analyze the jurisprudence on the synergy between judicial and administrative power in the implementation of ecological restoration,and improve the existing implementation system through legal interpretation.
关 键 词:生态环境修复 司法权 行政权 环境民事公益诉讼 司法执行
分 类 号:D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7