票据纠纷案件新型疑难问题研究  

Research on the New and Difficult Problems of Negotiable Instruments Disputes

作　　者：张雪楳[1] Zhang Xuemei

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（民商法学）》2022年第4期149-158,共10页Civil and Commercial Law

摘　　要：本文主要对《全国法院民商事审判工作会议纪要》《票据法》及其司法解释所涉及的票据问题进行研究。坚持票据行为无因性原则,并不意味着不需要审理和考察持票人取得票据手段是否合法问题。要正确理解票据行为无因性的立法目的,正确认定票据权利人。票据行为无因性的立法目的是促进票据流通,保护善意第三人,而非保护非法取得票据者。存在我国《票据法》第12条规定情形的,持票人不享有票据权利。当事人以民间贴现为业的,因该行为违反了特许经营的规定,故应认定无效。票据质押背书是票据质权的设立要件,不具备该要件的,应认定票据质押未依法设立。在可以完成质押背书设立要件的情形下,人民法院可以依据当事人的诉请,判决对方当事人承担完成该设立要件的责任。This paper focuses on the issues involved in Minutes of the National Conference on Civil and Commercial trials,the Negotiable Instruments Law of the People's Republic of China and its judicial interpretation.We should understand thelegislative purpose of the abstraction of negotiable instruments correctly to identify thelegal holder.The purpose is to promote the circulation of negotiable instruments andto protect a third party in good faith.A holder who acquires a negotiable instrument inconformity with Article 12 of the Negotiable Instruments Law of the People's Republic of China shall have no right.The act that take the non-governmental bill discount as abusiness shall be invalid because it violates the franchise laws.Endorsement of pledgeis the essential requirement of bill pledge.In the case that the establishment of the billpledge can be completed,the court may decide to complete the endorsement of pledgeaccording to the claims of the litigant.

关 键 词：票据无因性 合法持票人 民间贴现 票据质押 

分 类 号：D922.287[政治法律—经济法学]