福利国家模式、职业结构与不平等原因  被引量:1

Welfare-State Regimes,Occupational Structure and Causes to Inequality

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:袁富华[1,2] 吴湛 YUAN Fuhua;WU Zhan(Institute of Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100836,China;School of Economics,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)

机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院经济研究所,北京100836 [2]中国社会科学院大学经济学院,北京102488

出  处:《浙江工商大学学报》2023年第1期93-105,共13页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University

基  金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“数字经济促进高质量发展的政治经济学研究”(20AJL004)。

摘  要:福特主义工业社会向后福特主义服务经济的转变,赋予各类福利国家诸多新特征。从职业分层来看,经济服务化过程中大量专业岗位的创造及其对熟练技能的需求,使得教育以及其他社会政策,越来越成为推动阶层流动的决定力量。从收入分布来看,全球化、去管制化、去工业化与老龄化、经济服务化、城市化的叠加,使得福利国家模式普遍呈现出收入极化或不平等,中产衰退的迹象也比较明显。效率公平权衡的努力,进一步加剧了福利国家模式分化。鉴于高度现代化过程中不断出现的困难和挑战,产业均衡发展,经济政策与社会政策协调,构成稳妥推进共同富裕的重要基础。From the Fordist industrial society to the post-Fordist service society,many new characteristics emerged in the welfare states.In terms of occupational stratification,the emergence of great number of professional jobs in the process of servitization as well as its demand for skilled workers had made education and other social policies increasingly become the decisive forces for class mobility.From the perspective of income distribution,globalization,deregulation,deindustrialization combined with the composite issues of aging,servitization and urbanization have led to polarized or uneven income distribution in almost all welfare states,and the middle class declined generally.Efforts aimed at balancing efficiency and equity magnified the divergence of welfare states.In the light of the difficulties encountered by developed countries in the pursuit of modernization,balanced industrial development and co-ordination between economic and social policies are the cornerstone of common prosperity.

关 键 词:福利国家 职业结构 机会公平 共同富裕 

分 类 号:F13[经济管理—世界经济]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象