检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈太清 郁倩 陈艺漩 施苏苏 刘静 杨鸿任 徐林睿 Chen Tai-qing;YU Qian;Chen Yi-xuan;SHI Su-su;LIU Jing;Yang Hong-ren;XU Lin-rui(School of Intellectual Property,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing 210094,China;Comprehensive Law Enforcement Team of Urban Construction Management,Haimen District,Nantong 226000,Jiangsu,China;Yuelai Institute of Natural Resources,Haimen District Bureau of Natural Resources and Planning,Nantong 226000,China;The First Procuratorial Department of Jinhu People's Procuratorate,Huaian 211600,Jiangsu,China;Administrative Review Response Department,Laoshan District Justice Bureau,Qingdao 266000,Shandong,China;Intellectual Property Research Institute,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China)
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏南京210094 [2]南通市海门区城市管理局城市建设管理综合执法大队,江苏南通226000 [3]南通市海门区自然资源与规划局悦来自然资源所,江苏南通226000 [4]金湖县人民检察院第一检察部,江苏淮安211600 [5]青岛市崂山区司法局行政复议应诉科,山东青岛266000 [6]厦门大学知识产权研究院,福建厦门361005
出 处:《西部现代职业教育研究》2022年第1期45-54,58,共11页Research on Modern Vocational Education in Western China
摘 要:伴随着大数据时代的到来,网络装备、皮肤、角色、电子账号、虚拟庄园、淘宝店铺、充值币卡等虚拟财产进入人们的生活。因虚拟财产引发的民事纠纷逐渐增多,主要包括因虚拟财产交易流转、继承、分割引发的物权纠纷、用户与网络运营商之间的服务合同合同纠纷和第三人侵犯虚拟财产权利人合法权益所引发的侵权纠纷等。在确定具体的民事法律关系时,需要明确虚拟财产的法律性质,进而对其进行准确的法律适用。学术界对于虚拟财产的性质界定没有统一的理论观点,司法实务中的主要争议是用户对虚拟财产享有的权利性质,不同的法院对虚拟财产的定性作出物权、债权、无形财产权、使用权和不予认定的判决,司法裁判不一致的现象大量产生,不利于保障虚拟财产合法所有权人的权益。因此,明确虚拟财产的法律属性采物权说并建构起虚拟财产民事保护的相关规则显得尤为重要。With the advent of the era of big data,virtual properties such as network equipment,skin,role,electronic account,virtual manor,Taobao shop,top-up currency card have entered people's lives.Civil disputes caused by virtual property are gradually increasing,mainly including real right disputes caused by virtual property transaction and circulation,inheritance and division,service contract disputes between users and network operators,and infringement disputes caused by the infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of virtual property owners by third parties.In determining the specific civil legal relationship,it is necessary to clarify the legal nature of virtual property,and then apply it accurately.Academics in the nature of virtual property defines no unified theory viewpoint,and the main controversy in the judicial practice of virtual property rights is the user properties,different courts to qualitative property of virtual property rights,creditor's rights,intangible property right,the right to use and will not be decided that verdict,the production of large Numbers of the judicial referee inconsistent phenomenon,It is not conducive to protecting the rights and interests of the legal owners of virtual property.Therefore,it is particularly important to clarify the legal attribute of virtual property and establish relevant rules for the civil protection of virtual property.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7