违约精神损害赔偿司法适用问题实证分析——以1295个合同纠纷案为研究样本  

An Empirical Analysis of the Judicial Application of Compensation for Breach of Contract Spiritual Damage:Taking 1295 Contract Dispute Cases as Research Samples

作　　者：陈芷琼 CHEN Zhiqiong(College of Law,Guangdong University of Finance and Economics,Guangzhou 510320,China)

机构地区：[1]广东财经大学法学院,广东广州510320

出　　处：《东莞理工学院学报》2023年第2期94-101,128,共9页Journal of Dongguan University of Technology

基　　金：广东省科技创新战略专项资金一般项目(pdjh2023b0219)。

摘　　要：单纯违约能否主张精神损害赔偿一直是学术界争议话题,存在着肯定说与否定说,司法判决和理论通说均持否定说,而《民法典》第996条在一定程度上认可了合同守约方在人格权遭受严重精神损害时可以请求赔偿精神损失,具有里程碑意义。但该条款的责任性质、损害认定、赔偿数额等仍有待明确。采用实证分析法,对1295个合同纠纷案的总体特点、原告诉求、判决结果进行分析,以发现违约精神损害赔偿在司法适用实践中存在的问题,并探索解决路径。实证分析结果显示,违约精神损害赔偿制度仍有确立的必要,应当是将第九百九十六条界定为违约性质,并调整为合同编下。Whether the liability for breach of contract can be applied to the mental damage compensation system has been a controversial topic in academic circles.There are positive and negative theories,and judicial decisions and general theories are negative.Article 996 of the Civil Code,to a certain extent,recognizes that the parties to the contract can claim compensation for mental damage when their personality rights are seriously damaged,which is of milestone significance.However,the nature of liability,damage identification and compensation amount of this clause remain to be clarified.The empirical analysis method is used to analyze the overall characteristics,plaintiff’s appeals and judgment results of 1295 contract disputes,so as to find out the problems existing in the judicial application of compensation for mental damage due to breach of contract and explore the solutions.The empirical analysis results show that it is still necessary to establish the system of mental damage compensation for breach of contract.Article 996 should be defined as the nature of breach of contract and adjusted to the contract.

关 键 词：违约责任 精神损害赔偿 侵权 实证分析 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]