检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王乃家 Wang Naijia(Liaoning Provincial Transportation Planning and Design Institute Co.,Ltd.,Shenyang 110166,China)
机构地区:[1]辽宁省交通规划设计院有限责任公司,沈阳市110166
出 处:《北方交通》2023年第4期91-94,共4页Northern Communications
摘 要:通过对现行公路定额路基工程六级土石分类与十六级土石分类的对照,量化了公路路基工程定额中各类岩石的抗压强度指标;通过公路定额各类岩石的强度指标与国标和行业规范的岩石强度分级对比,总结出公路定额与行业规范岩石强度指标划分的较大差异;通过分析工作实践发现的问题,提出了工程设计和造价编制中的注意事项;通过相关行业定额岩石强度指标划分的对比,对公路工程定额的修编完善提出建议。The compressive strength indicators of various rocks in the highway subgrade engineering quota are quantified by comparing the current highway subgrade engineering quota with the grade 6 soil and rock classification and the grade 16 soil and rock classification;the significant differences in the classification of rock strength indicators between the highway quota and industrial specification are summarized by comparing the strength indicators of various types of rocks in the highway quota with the rock strength grading in national standard and industrial specification;the matters needing attention in the engineering design and cost compilation are put forward by analyzing the problems found in work practice;the suggestions are put forward for the revision and improvement of the highway engineering quota by comparing the classification of rock strength indicators in relevant industrial quota.
关 键 词:公路工程定额 十六级土石分类 定额与规范的岩石强度对比 公路定额岩石子目划分 相关行业定额岩石子目划分 修编建议
分 类 号:U415.13[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.34.209