检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨妍 段丽[1] YANG Yan;DUAN Li(Law School,Taiyuan University of Science and Technology,Taiyuan Shanxi,030024)
出 处:《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第2期16-20,27,共6页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:随意殴打型寻衅滋事罪是实践中发生频率最高的寻衅滋事罪类型,但该罪在适用过程中往往因缺乏明确的规范而广受争议。通过细化该罪所保护的法益,明确刑法条文中“随意”“情节恶劣”具有价值判断的词语,提高该罪的入罪门槛,并纠正司法实践中对寻衅滋事罪的曲解,否定该罪的补充性,减少实践中的客观归罪现象,对符合出罪要求的行为做出罪处理,降低该罪在司法实践中的适用。The crime of random beating and provoking trouble is the most frequent type of picking quarrels and provoking troubles in practice,but the crime is often widely controversial in the trial process because of the lack of clear norms.By refining the legal interests protected by the crime,the words of“arbitrary”and“serious plot”in the criminal law are made clear,and the entry threshold of the crime is raised.To correct the misinterpretation of the crime of picking quarrels and provoking trouble in judicial practice,deny the supplementary of the crime,reduce the objective imputation phenomenon in practice,make the crime treatment of the behavior that meets the requirements of the crime,and reduce the application of the crime in judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30