功能主义刑法解释论“问题性思考”命题检讨  

Review of Proposition of"Problematic Thinking"in Functionalist Theory of Criminal Law Interpretation

作　　者：魏东[1] Wei Dong

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（刑事法学）》2022年第7期123-136,共14页criminal law

基　　金：四川大学法学院双一流专项研究课题“刑法解释方法的体系化与教义化探索”(编号:sculaw0505)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：中国语境下的功能主义刑法解释论应当认真对待和深刻检讨“问题性思考”这一法哲学基础命题,从偏重结果的功能主义转向结果与方法并重的、整体有效性的功能主义,从法官决策行动论转向法官决策有效论,坚定主张并深刻论证刑法解释方法确证功能体系化命题,努力追求并真正实现刑法解释结论合法性、合理性和合目的性“三性统一体”有效性。当前应进一步完善具有中国特色的案例指导制度,从微观上具体展开中国本土化的问题性思考,切实解决机械司法问题,并以此作为当下我国功能主义刑法解释论的重要创新点。The criminal law interpretation theory on the functionalism in Chinese context should take the basic proposition of legal philosophy seriously,that is,“problematic thinking”.In addition,lay equal stress on the results and methods,and focus on the overall effectiveness instead of the result-oriented functionalism.The judge’s decision-making supposed to be more intersubjective rather than autarchic.Furthermore,deepen the studying on the function of criminal law interpretation method to confirm its systematism,so as to truly realize the trinity of legality,reasonability,and purposiveness of interpretation conclusion.At present,the case guidance system with Chinese characteristics should be further improved,the issues of Chinese localization should be developed at a micro level,and the mechanical judicial process should be solved effectively.These are the critical points and innovations of improving the criminal law interpretation on the functionalism in Chinese context.

关 键 词：刑法解释 问题性思考 整体有效性 司法公正论 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]