刑民衔接视域下信息网络传播行为侵权与入罪范围的教义学分析——以《刑法修正案(十一)》相关修改为背景  

Doctrinal Analysis on the Scope of Infringement and Criminalization of Information Network Communication from the Perspective of Joint between Criminal Law and Civil Law

作　　者：杨馥铭 Yang Fuming

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（刑事法学）》2022年第12期107-116,共10页criminal law

基　　金：2020年度国家社科基金重大项目“健全支持民营经济发展的刑事法治研究”(编号20&ZD198,时延安主持)。

摘　　要：当前著作权法理论关于信息网络传播行为的认定标准之争本质上是权利配置之争。网络环境下著作权法律关系主体之间利益关系的错综复杂,决定了任何一种权利配置方案都难以避免“顾此失彼”的尴尬。应当放弃权利配置导向,对“向公众提供”采取平义解释,在较为宽泛的意义上界定信息网络传播行为,同时以利益平衡为导向限制信息网络传播行为构成侵权和犯罪的范围。判断某种交互式网络传播行为是否构成侵权或者犯罪的关键在于该行为是否经权利人许可。权利人明示许可和默示许可均可阻却侵权和犯罪的成立。默示许可的适用须基于两个前提:一是对权利人内心许可意思的推测有足够的依据,二是网络传播行为没有明显违背权利人的意愿或明显损害权利人的利益。At present,the dispute over the determination of communication through information network in the theory of copyright law is essentially a dispute over the allocation of rights.Under the network environment,the interest relationship between the subjects of copyright legal relationship is complex,which determines that any right allocation scheme is difficult to avoid the embarrassment of"taking care of one and losing the other".We should abandon the right allocation orientation,and adopt the literal interpretation of"providing to the public"to define the act of communication through information network in a broader sense and limit the scope of infringement and crime oriented by the balance of interests.The key to determine whether an interactive network communication act constitutes infringement or crime lies in whether it's approved by the obligee.Both express and implied permission of the obligee can block infringement or crime.The application of implied permission should be based on two premises:one is that there is sufficient basis for the inner permission of the obligee,and the other is that the network communication does not obviously violate the will of the obligee or obviously damage the interests of the obligee.

关 键 词：信息网络传播行为 向公众提供 利益平衡 默示许可 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学] D924.3[政治法律—法学]