刑法中行为单复数的判断:事实与规范之间  

On Judging Singular Behavior and Plural Behaviors:Between Fact and Norm

作　　者：王彦强[1] Wang Yanqiang

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（刑事法学）》2022年第2期20-35,共16页criminal law

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“竞合理论的体系构建和适用问题研究”(项目编号:20BFX116)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：行为单数与行为复数是竞合论的分水岭,也是想象竞合与实质竞合的区分标准。行为数乃前构成要件的事实概念,不应以“构成要件该当次数”“法益数”等规范标准来判断行为单复数,只能从事实层面根据类型化的“单一行为的客观结构形式”,并结合主观意思决定的单一性来判断。但规范并非无所作为,除了以“前见”介入事实判断外,它还通过其立法创制机能实现对行为单数的拟制;不作为犯、过失犯等特殊犯罪形态的行为单复数也离不开解释论上的规范性判断。The number of behaviors is not only the dividing line of concurrence of offenses,but also the key to distinguishing constructed concurrence of offenses and real concurrence of offenses.Since the number of behaviors is an empirical fact,the judgment thereof should not depend on the number of constitutive requirements and legal interests,but on the human behavior and intentional decision.In the meantime,normative judgment can also play a role.Not only does it affect the judgment of the number of behaviors as"prior-knowledge",but also realizes the fictionalization of the singular behavior through its creative function on the legislative theory.Moreover,the judgment of the singular behavior of obligation offenses,such as omission offenses and negligent offenses,cannot be separated from the normative judgment.

关 键 词：行为单数 行为复数 事实论 规范论 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]