检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐军[1] 郑仰礼 XU Jun;ZHENG Yang-li(Hohai University Law School,Nanjing 211100,Jiangsu,China)
出 处:《湿地科学与管理》2023年第2期71-74,78,共5页Wetland Science & Management
基 金:2020年度江苏省社会科学研究基金重点项目“我国生态环境修复制度的体系化研究”(20FXA002)。
摘 要:湿地保护是生态文明建设的关键环节,各国推行的湿地保护政策不尽相同,但多数国家是通过政府和市场的双重机制将湿地生态补偿与湿地保护的目标相结合。目前我国的湿地生态补偿制度尚显不足,存在立法滞后、边际模糊、程序缺位、监督缺位等问题。在比较法视域下考察加拿大、美国、印度、泰国的湿地生态补偿实践,借鉴其成熟的湿地生态补偿经验。从制定生态补偿法、明确法律关系要素内容、完善程序性规范、健全监督机制等方面入手,由此完善我国湿地生态补偿法律制度。Wetland protection is crucial to the construction of ecological civilization.Different countries have different wetland protection policies,but most countries combine wetland ecological compensation with wetland protection through the dual mechanism of government and market.At present,wetland ecological compensation system in China is still insufficient,and there are many problems such as legislation lag,marginal ambiguity,absence of procedure and inadequate supervision service.From the perspective of comparative law,this paper examines the wetland ecological compensation practices in Canada,the United States,India and Thailand,and learn from the mature experiences of wetland ecological compensation from these countries.The legal system of wetland ecological compensation in China should be improved by formulating the ecological compensation law,clarifying the elements of legal relationship,improving procedural norms,and improving the supervision mechanism.
分 类 号:D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.79