检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马婧仪 MA Jing-yi(Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学,北京100871
出 处:《山东女子学院学报》2023年第3期45-53,共9页Journal of Shandong Women's University
摘 要:在当代女性寻求“性别公正”的过程中,男性主体也被置于巨大的不确定性当中。这是一个男性气质不断变动的时代,有关理想男性形象的讨论从未停止。通过对大卫•D.吉尔默的《发明男性气概》进行系统梳理,可将问题导向学界对男性气概与男性气质的论争,同时回顾男性研究的历史,以澄清概念之间的差异与联系。尽管目前国内的男性研究领域仍然比较沉默,但也在一定程度上拥有了理性自觉。通过考察国内的男性气质研究现状,并分析经验研究中理论的呈现方式,能够指出未来的拓展方向,这有利于构建更加和谐的性别文化。Currently,in women’s quest for“gender justice”,the male subject is also placed in the midst of great uncertainty.This is an era in which masculinity itself is in flux,and the discussion on the ideal image of men never stops.A systematic review of David D.Gilmore’s Manhood in the Making:Cultural Concepts of Masculinity can direct the issue to the academic debates on manhood and masculinity.Reviewing the history of men’s studies can clarify the differences and connections between the two concepts.Although the field of men’s studies in China is still relatively silent,it also possesses a certain degree of rational self-awareness.By examining the current state of masculinity research in China and analyzing the way theories are presented in empirical studies,the future direction of expansion can be pointed out,which is conducive to building a more harmonious gender culture.
关 键 词:男性气质 男性气概 男性研究 masculinities
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.254.11