限制数据抓取行为正当性及判定研究——基于“权利侵害”与“行为正当性”两种判断标准  

Research on the Justification and Determination of Restricted Data Crawling-Based on the Criteria of"Infringement of Rights"and"Justification of Acts"

作　　者：赵丽莉 孙宏娇 

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学知识产权学院 [2]山东科技大学数字法治研究院

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2023年第3期40-49,共10页Electronics Intellectual Property

基　　金：2020年山东省高等学校“青创科技计划”项目“新旧动能转换重点产业科技知识产权战略研究”(项目编号:2020RWB003)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：在数据流通共享与竞争背景下,各主体之间因数据抓取与限制行为产生博弈。限制数据抓取行为的正当性及其判定研究有助于进一步分析数据排他行为,便于平衡数据流通与数据保护二者之间的关系。然而,限制数据抓取行为正当性判定的司法实践显示存在“权利侵害”与“行为正当性”两种判断思路,这需要采用适当的标准判定限制数据抓取行为正当性边界。为确保数据开放与数据权利保护利益最大化衡平,可回归鼓励竞争的价值导向,构建以“利益衡量”为核心的“行为正当性”判定标准,在公共利益、经营者利益、消费者利益的“三元叠加”利益衡量格局下,利用比例原则进行统筹,以更好地促进规范市场秩序、促进公平竞争。In the context of data circulation,sharing and competition,the game between data capture and restriction is created between various subjects,and the justification of restricting data capture is analyzed,and the competition is discussed in the context of market competition.Judicial practice shows that there are two ways of judging"infringement of rights"and"justification of behavior",and the application of general provisions of the anti-unfair competition law and the consideration of robots agreement need to be regulated.This requires the further construction of the"conduct justification"standard with"interest measurement"as the core when determining the restriction of data capture,and the return to the value-oriented approach of encouraging competition,in the public interest,the interests of operators and consumers.Under the"ternary overlapping"interest measurement pattern,the principle of proportionality should be used to coordinate,so as to better promote the regulation of market order and fair competition.

关 键 词：数据抓取 限制行为 不正当竞争 数据权益 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]