水产养殖中传统增氧设备能耗差异分析  

Analysis of Energy Consumption Difference of Traditional Aeration Equipment in Aquaculture

作　　者：顾海涛[1] 倪琦[1,2] 吴姗姗 钟伟[1] 韩梦遐[1] Gu Haitao;Ni Qi;Wu Shanshan;Zhong Wei;Han Mengxia(Fishery Machinery and Instrument Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences,Shanghai 200092,China;Key Laboratory of Fishery Equipment and Engineering,Ministry of Agriculture,Shanghai 200092,China)

机构地区：[1]中国水产科学研究院渔业机械仪器研究所,上海200092 [2]农业农村部渔业装备与工程技术重点实验室,上海200092

出　　处：《现代农业装备》2023年第2期51-56,61,共7页Modern Agricultural Equipment

基　　金：国家海水鱼产业技术体系(CARS-47-G20)。

摘　　要：为分析水产养殖中应用广泛的叶轮式增氧机、水车式增氧机、涌浪式增氧机和曝气式增氧机4种机型的能耗,本文统计和分析了2020年以来109台4种型式增氧机的动力效率试验数据。结果显示,配套变频永磁电动机的增氧机能耗比传统异步电动机显著降低,动力效率提高了5.6%;水车式增氧机动力效率等主要性能有了大幅提高,超过了SC/T 6010-2018叶轮式增氧机中规定同规格叶轮式增氧机动力效率的要求;涌浪式增氧机动力效率达到或超过了同规格叶轮式增氧机的性能指标;水产养殖中使用的曝气式增氧机效率远低于环保领域使用的动力效率。In order to analyze the energy consumption of four types of aerators,which are widely used in aquaculture,such as impeller aerator,paddle wheel aerator,surge aerator and micropore aerator,the dynamic efficiency test data of 109 sets of four types of aerator since 2020 were statistically analyzed.The results show that,compared with the traditional induction motor,the energy consumption of the aerator with variable frequency permanent magnet motor is significantly reduced,and the oxygen transfer efficiency is increased by 5.6%;the oxygen transfer efficiency and other main performance of the paddle wheel aerator has been greatly improved,exceeding the requirements of the oxygen transfer efficiency of the impeller oxygenator stipulated in SC/T 6010-2018;the oxygen transfer efficiency of the surge aerator reaches or exceeds the performance index of the impeller aerator of the same specification;the oxygen transfer efficiency of micropore aerator used in aquaculture is far lower than that used in the field of environmental protection.

关 键 词：水产养殖 增氧设备 能耗 差异分析 

分 类 号：S969[农业科学—水产养殖]