基于CiteSpace和VOSviewer文献计量法的急性肺损伤文献可视化图谱分析  

Literature visualization analysis of acute lung injury based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer bibliometric method

作　　者：贺燕玲 毛祥正 李莎[2] 王斌[1] 刘继平[1] 晁旭[3] 王国全 HE Yanling;MAO Xiangzheng;LI Sha;WANG Bin;LIU Jiping;CHAO Xu;WANG Guoquan(School of Pharmacy,Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine,Shaanxi Province,Xianyang712046,China;Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine,Shaanxi Province,Xianyang712000,China;Department of Infectious Diseases,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine,Shaanxi Province,Xianyang712000,China)

机构地区：[1]陕西中医药大学药学院,陕西咸阳712046 [2]陕西中医药大学第二附属医院妇产科,陕西咸阳712000 [3]陕西中医药大学第二附属医院感染科,陕西咸阳712000

出　　处：《中国医药导报》2023年第11期31-36,共6页China Medical Herald

基　　金：陕西省自然科学基金项目(2021JM-470);陕西省中医药管理局项目(2021-GJ-JC007);陕西省科技厅创新人才推进计划-青年科技新星项目(2017KJXX-81);陕西省教育厅项目(21JTY02);陕西省咸阳市科技局自然科学项目(2011K13-04);陕西中医药大学学科创新团队项目(2019-YL13)。

摘　　要：目的运用文献计量法对急性肺损伤进行可视化图谱分析。方法检索中国知网、PubMed数据库中2002年1月至2021年12月有关急性肺损伤的研究文献,使用CiteSpace和VOSviewer对纳入文献的作者、研究单位、国家、关键词进行可视化图谱分析。结果中国知网、PubMed数据库分别纳入10376、20335篇文献,发文比较差异明显;发文作者分析发现目前以钱桂生、邱海波、段蕴铀、Michael Matthay、Paolo Pelosi、Danile Traber团队发文较多;对于该疾病研究较广的国家主要有美国、中国、德国等。关键词对比分析发现中国知网数据库研究主要集中在炎症、氧化应激、信号通路、疾病感染源、动物模型、肺表面活性物质、机械通气等方面;PubMed数据库中对发病人群、动物疾病模型、疾病感染源、血流动力学、急性肺损伤的诊疗统计、实验机制中的炎症因子、过氧化物研究、免疫调节等有详细研究。结论急性肺损伤在国内外一直都被热点关注,中国知网、PubMed数据库研究比较差异明显,目前对于其研究多在血液指标、炎症因子、免疫平衡、机械通气相关的实验基础和临床应用方面,且发达国家对其研究较多。Objective To analyze the visual atlas of acute lung injury by bibliometric method.Methods Literature on acute lung injury was searched in Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and PubMed databases from January 2002 to December 2021.CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to visualize the authors,research units,countries,and keywords of the included documents.Results A total of 10376 and 20335 literatures were included in Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and PubMed databases respectively,and there were obvious differences in the published papers between them.Analysis about the authors of the papers indicated that the teams of Qian Guisheng,Qiu Haibo,Duan Yunyu,Michael Matthay,Paolo Pelosi,and Danile Traber published more papers;the major countries were the United States,China,and Germany;key words comparative analysis found that Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure research were mainly focused on inflammation,oxidative stress,signaling pathway,disease infection source,animal model,pulmonary surfactant,mechanical ventilation,etc.;the PubMed database were mainly focused on the incidence population,animal disease models,disease infection sources,hemodynamics,acute lung injury diagnosis and treatment statistics,inflammatory factors in experimental mechanisms,peroxide research,and immune regulation.Conclusion Acute lung injury has been a hot topic at home and abroad,and there is a significant difference in the comparison between Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and PubMed studies.At present,most of its studies are on the experimental basis and clinical application related to blood indicators,inflammatory factors,immune balance and mechanical ventilation,and there are more studies on it in developed countries.

关 键 词：急性肺损伤 文献计量学 CITESPACE VOSviewer 

分 类 号：R641[医药卫生—外科学]