检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:俞宏军 刘兆瑞 于保强 YU Hongjun;LIU Zhaorui;YU Baoqiang
机构地区:[1]中冶集团资源开发有限公司,北京100028 [2]中国恩菲工程技术有限公司,北京100038
出 处:《中国矿山工程》2023年第2期77-81,共5页China Mine Engineering
摘 要:本文对山达克铜矿新建选厂碎磨流程进行半自磨工艺与高压辊磨工艺的详细技术经济比较。结果表明,建设投资方面高压辊磨流程比半自磨流程高567.4万美元;运营成本方面,高压辊磨流程能耗低,半自磨流程比高压辊磨流程吨矿电耗高2.78 kWh/t,全流程来看半自磨流程比高压辊磨流程吨矿成本高0.54美元;综合费用现值,当折现率8%时半自磨流程比高压辊磨流程费用现值高708.6万美元。综上所述,山达克铜矿采用高压辊磨工艺具有更好的经济效益。Technical and economic comparison between SABC and HPGR process was conducted for Shandake copper mine new plant.The results indicate that the investment of HPGR process is 5674 thousand dollar higher than SABC process.Energy consumption for treating one ton of ore of SABC process is 2.78 kWh/t higher than that of HPGR process.The operating cost of HPGR process is 0.54 dollar lower than SABC process when treating one ton of ore.Net present value of SABC process is 7086 thousand dollar higher than that of HPGR process when internal rate of return is 8%.In the long run,HPGR process has more better economic benefits for Shandake copper mine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7