基于改进的AHP-CRITIC模型在冲击地压综合评价中的应用  

Application of Improved AHP-CRITIC Model in Comprehensive Evaluation of Rock Burst

作　　者：尚晋 连清旺[1] 陈鑫淋 杨浩如 SHANG Jin;LIAN Qingwang;CHEN Xinlin;YANG Haoru(Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of In-situ Modified Mining,Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan 030024,China)

机构地区：[1]太原理工大学、原位改性采矿教育部重点实验室,太原030024

出　　处：《煤炭技术》2023年第4期61-64,共4页Coal Technology

基　　金：山西省自然科学基金资助项目(201901D22111524092721525503105701)。

摘　　要：针对煤矿冲击地压评价过程中存在未知信息难以定量化分析和研究的问题,提出一种综合交叉评价方法,通过重构AHP标度得到主观权重并通过最小鉴别信息原理融合改进的CRITIC客观权重得到综合评价权重并建立加权矩阵,利用TOPSIS分析法计算各评价对象与理想解的相对贴近度。运用该评价方法可以有效减小决策信息损失,更好地利用主客观评价信息提高评价精确度,通过引入算例证明评价结果与主观一致性较好,相对贴合度较改进前的平均精度提高了2.16%,与模糊法和传统方法相比适用性好,准确性更高。Aiming at the problem that unknown information is difficult to be quantitatively analyzed and studied in the evaluation process of coal mine rockburst a comprehensive cross evaluation method is proposed.Subjective weight is obtained by reconstructing AHP scale and comprehensive evaluation weight is obtained by integrating improved objective weight of CRITIC through the principle of minimum discriminating information and a weighting matrix is established.TOPSIS analysis method is used to calculate each evaluation the relative closeness of the object to the ideal solution.The application of this evaluation method can effectively reduce the loss of decision information and better use the subjective and objective evaluation information to improve the evaluation accuracy.The introduction of an example proves that the evaluation results are in good consistency with the subjective results and the relative fit degree is 2.16%higher than the average accuracy before the improvement.Compared with the fuzzy method and the traditional method it has good applicability and higher accuracy providing a new idea and a new method for coal mine rockburst methods.

关 键 词：冲击地压 综合交叉方法 CRITIC 最小信息鉴别原理 TOPSIS 

分 类 号：TD324[矿业工程—矿井建设]