检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:车丕照[1] CHE Pizhao
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院
出 处:《中国法律评论》2023年第2期102-115,共14页China Law Review
摘 要:在世界处于百年未有之大变局的情势下,国际经济法也必将发生变革,而法律制度的变革需要理论支持,因此,应该对未来国际经济法的理论基础有所预判。18世纪中期以来,国际经济法一直以经济自由主义作为其理论基础,即使在自由主义不占据理论主导地位时期也是如此。近年来,在自由主义无法解释和解决现实的经济社会问题的同时,各种理论思潮风起云涌,对自由主义形成冲击。未来国际经济法的理论基础很有可能从传统的自由主义转向以节制资本为主要特征的“有限制的自由主义”。As the world is undergoing major changes unseen in a century,international economic law will also undergo changes,and such systematic changes require theoretical support.Therefore,it is necessary to anticipate the theoretical basis of future international economic law.Since the mid-18th century,international economic law has always taken economic liberalism as its theoretical basis,even when liberalism did not occupy a theoretical dominant position.In recent years,while liberalism has been unable to explain and solve real economic and social problems,various theoretical trends have surged,impacting liberalism.The theoretical basis of international economic law in the future is likely to shift from traditional liberalism to"restricted liberalism"characterized by restraint on capital.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.211.44