检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:樊荣 黄晓敏 FAN Rong;HUANG Xiaomin
机构地区:[1]太原理工大学马克思主义学院
出 处:《中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第2期23-34,共12页Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“中国共产党农民教育与乡村社会的新型国家建构研究(1949—1966)”(项目编号:20BKS025)。
摘 要:随着信息技术的迅猛发展,网络空间日益演绎成为意识形态领导权争斗和争夺的话语空间,导致网络空间意识形态治理的难度和复杂性更加凸显,坚持协同治理成为顺势而为。参与网络空间意识形态治理的领导主体、主导主体及参与主体的层级性结构表征不同于现实空间而趋于平等化,各主体的功能随之发生变化,导致主体间协同关系更需要具有公共性,从而多主体协同参与治理成为发展趋向。而当前网络空间意识形态多主体协同治理却面临困境,对去中心化的误解制约了治理主体实现协同,参与主体的不同利益选择阻碍了达成协同治理意愿,网民无序表达行为与协同治理的价值目标相背离,最终导致治理主体合力不足而弱化了协同治理效应。为此,应秉承协同治理理念塑造稳定有序的网络空间,制定健全相关法律法规,完善主体合力机制,打造完善的网络公共讨论平台等方面,为多主体协同治理提供空间和渠道,构建适应网络空间意识形态治理的多主体协同治理新格局。With the rapid development of information technology,cyberspace has increasingly become a discourse space for ideological leadership struggle and competition,which leads to the difficulty and complexity of ideological governance in cyberspace.Therefore,it is necessary to adhere to collaborative governance.The hierarchical structure representation of leading subjects,dominant subjects and participating subjects involved in the ideological governance of cyberspace is different from the real space and tends to be equal,and the function of each subject changes accordingly,which leads to the need for the cooperative relationship between the subjects to be more public,so that the cooperative participation of multiple subjects in governance becomes a development trend.However,the current multi-agent collaborative governance of ideology in cyberspace is facing a dilemma.The misunderstanding of decentralization restricts the coordination of governance subjects,the different interest choices of participants hinder the will to attain collaborative governance,and the disorderly expressing behavior of netizens departs from the value goal of collaborative governance,which ultimately leads to the lack of synergy of governance subjects and weakens the effect of collaborative governance.The way out of this dilemma is to forge a stable and orderly cyberspace by adhering to the concept of collaborative governance,formulate and improve relevant laws and regulations,improve the mechanism of joint force among the participating subjects,build a perfect online public discussion platform,provide space and channels for multi-agent collaborative governance,and create a new pattern of multi-agent collaborative governance that is adapted to the ideological governance of cyberspace.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49