“自传体问题”与中国现代文学的主体性潜力--以德国的庐隐、萧红、郁达夫研究为例  

“Problem of Autobiography”and Potential of Subjectivity in Modern Chinese Literature--Taking Studies of Luyin,Xiao Hong and Yu Dafu in Germany as Examples

作　　者：范劲[1] FAN Jin

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中文系

出　　处：《社会科学》2023年第4期76-86,共11页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“卢曼系统论在‘世界文学’框架塑造上的应用研究”(项目编号:19BWW007)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：中国现代文学中有无自传体的问题,曾受到德国汉学界的高度重视。这一看似自明的“问题”在德国语境中生成,有赖于一系列系统条件。自传是西方自我文化的一部分,历来承担着主体塑造的功能。生命哲学的历史化立场,打破了人格意识永恒不变的幻觉。思想史家鲍吾刚对中国自传史的梳理,意味着从整体上承认中国人的自我和个体性。中国文学研究者们则通过分析庐隐、萧红、郁达夫等的自传文本,更细腻地对中国作家的自我结构进行加工。系统中多个层面接力合作,将中国文学符号推入自传体的主体性轨道,借此,西方得以通过“自我”媒介和中国展开理性对话,域外的中国现代文学研究成为世界文化史的一部分。Whether there exsited the genre of autobiography in modern Chinese literature was a question that received a great deal of attention in German sinology at one time.But the emergence of this self-evident“problem” in the German context depended on a series of systematic conditions.Autobiography is part of the occidental“culture of the self” and has traditionally assumed a subject-shaping function.The historicist position of the philosophy of life breaks the illusion that the consciousness of personality is eternal and unchanging.The intellectual historian Wolfgang Bauer's history of Chinese autobiographical writings implied a general recognition of the Chinese self and individuality.Some researchers of modern Chinese literature processed the self-structure of Chinese writers more specifically by analyzing the autobiographical texts of Luyin,Xiao Hong,Yu Dafu,and others.By cooperating at multiple levels in the system,Chinese literary symbols were pushed into the orbit of autobiographical subjectivity,thereby allowing the West to engage in rational dialogue with China through the medium“self” and the study of modern Chinese literature becomes part of the evolution of world culture.

关 键 词：自传体 系统条件 生命哲学 主体性 治理 

分 类 号：I109[文学—世界文学]