检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:昝凯 陈亚光[1] 徐淑霞[1] 周青[1] 王凤菊[1] 杨慧凤[1] 郑丽敏[1] 郭海芳[1] 李明军[1] 刘婷 ZAN Kai;CHEN Ya-guang;XU Shu-xia;ZHOU Qing;WANG Feng-ju;YANG Hui-feng;ZHENG Li-min;GUO Hai-fang;LI Ming-jun;LIU Ting(Anyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences/High-quality Soybean Improvement Engineering Technology Research Center,Anyang455000,Henan,China)
机构地区:[1]安阳市农业科学院/河南省优质大豆改良工程技术研究中心,河南安阳455000
出 处:《湖北农业科学》2023年第4期1-6,共6页Hubei Agricultural Sciences
基 金:河南省科技开放合作项目(182106000034)。
摘 要:采用层次分析法、熵权法、基于博弈论的组合权重赋权法构建综合评价体系,对2014年河南省夏大豆[Glycine max(Linn.)Merr.]区域试验的15个参试品种(系)进行综合分析评价,以期为大豆区试中合理评价参试品系提供方法和依据。结果表明,基于博弈论的组合权重赋权法确定的指标权重与层次分析法和熵权法确定的指标权重相关系数分别为0.897(P<0.01)和0.282(P>0.05);3种确权方法下的综合评分差异不显著;基于博弈论组合赋权的综合评分排名与层次分析法和熵权法确权的综合评分排名相关系数分别为0.872(P<0.01)和0.603(P<0.05),与品系的实际表现和审定及推广情况有较好的一致性。以上结果说明,基于博弈论的层次分析法和熵权法组合赋权构建的评价体系能够科学合理地确定大豆综合评价体系中评价指标的权重,基于此构建的综合评价体系能够对大豆区试中参试品系的综合表现作出合理评价。15 soybean varieties(lines)from the summer soybean[Glycine max(Linn.)Merr.]regional test in Henan Province in 2014 were comprehensively evaluated based on a comprehensive evaluation system which was constructed with the method of analytic hierarchy process(AHP),entropy weight method and combination weighting method based on game theory,thus to provide a method and basis for the reasonable evaluation of the tested lines in the soybean regional test.The results showed that the correlation coefficient between the combined weights determined by the combination weighting method based on game theory and the weights determined by AHP was 0.897(P<0.01),and this value was 0.282(P>0.05)between the combined weights and weights determined by entropy weight method.There were no significant differences in the comprehensive scores among the three weighting methods.The correlation coefficient of the comprehensive score ranking between the combination weighting method based on game theory and the analytic hierarchy process was 0.872(P<0.01),and this value between the combination weighting method based on game theory and the entropy method was 0.603(P<0.05),respectively.It showed good consistency with the actual performance,certification and promotion of the lines.The above results indicated that the evaluation system constructed with the combination weighting based on game theory could scientifically and reasonably determine the weights of the indicators in the soybean comprehensive evaluation system,and the comprehensive evaluation system constructed based on this could make a reasonable evaluation of the comprehensive performance of the tested lines in the soybean regional test.
关 键 词:大豆[Glycine max(Linn.)Merr.] 层次分析法 熵权法 组合赋权 博弈论 综合评价
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.189.95