机构地区:[1]School of Public Health,Fudan University,Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety,Ministry of Education,Shanghai,200032,China [2]Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University,Henan Children's Hospital,Zhengzhou,450003,China [3]Division of Infectious Disease,Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Early-warning on Infectious Disease,Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing,102206,China [4]West China School of Public Health,Sichuan University,Chengdu,610041,China [5]Laboratory of Molecular RNA Virology and Antiviral Strategies,Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Infectious Disease Translational Research Programme,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine,National University of Singapore,Singapore,117597,Singapore [6]NIHR Health Protection Research Unit for Emerging and Zoonotic Infections,Institute of Infection,Veterinary and Ecological Sciences University of Liverpool,Liverpool,L697BE,UK [7]Tropical&Infectious Disease Unit,Royal Liverpool University Hospital(member of Liverpool Health Partners),Liverpool,L78XP,UK
出 处:《Virologica Sinica》2023年第2期268-275,共8页中国病毒学(英文版)
基 金:supported by the National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China(No.81525023);in whole or in part,by a Wellcome Trust fellowship awarded to LT[205228/Z/16/Z];supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections(grant no.NIHR200907)at University of Liverpool in partnership with Public Health England(PHE),in collaboration with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and the University of Oxford.LT is based at the University of Liverpool.
摘 要:Hand,foot and mouth disease(HFMD)is a major public health problem among children in the Asia-Pacific region.The optimal specimen for HFMD virological diagnosis remains unclear.Enterovirus A71(EV-A71)neutralizing antibody titres detected in paired sera were considered the reference standard for calculating the sensitivity,specificity,positive and negative predictive value of throat swabs,rectal swabs,stool,blood samples and cerebrospinal fluid(CSF)by RT-PCR or ELISA assay.In this study,clinical samples from 276 HFMD patients were collected for analysing the sensitivity of different kind of specimens.Our results showed that stool had the highest sensitivity(88%,95%CI:74%–96%)and agreement with the reference standard(91%).The order of diagnostic yield for EV-A71 infection was stool samplerectal swab>throat swab>blood sample>CSF sample,and using a combination of clinical samples improved sensitivity for enterovirus detection.The sensitivity of ELISA for IgM antibody detection in sterile-site specimens was significantly higher than that of RT-PCR(serum/plasma:62%vs.2%,CSF:47%vs.0%)(P<0.002).In conclusion,our results suggest that stool has the highest diagnostic yield for EV-A71-infected HFMD.If stool is unavailable,rectal swabs can be collected to achieve a similar diagnostic yield.Otherwise,throat swabs may be useful in detecting positive samples.Although IgM in blood or CSF is diagnostically accurate,it lacks sensitivity,missing 40%–50%of cases.The higher proportion of severe cases and shorter interval between onset and sampling contributed to the increase in congruency between clinical testing and the serological reference standard.
关 键 词:Hand foot and mouth disease(HFMD) Enterovirus A71(EV-A71) Sensitivity SPECIFICITY Evaluation of diagnostic methods
分 类 号:R373.2[医药卫生—病原生物学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...