检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:乔术宝 Qiao Shu-bao(Bengbu City Huaiyuan County Ecological Environment Monitoring Station,Huaiyuan 233400,Anhui Province,China)
机构地区:[1]蚌埠市怀远县生态环境监测站,安徽怀远233400
出 处:《科学与信息化》2023年第9期64-66,共3页Technology and Information
摘 要:生态环境质量监测中,对于水质环境的监测是非常重要的一项内容。水质环境的健康与否,会直接影响到水资源的质量安全。水质环境在受到污染的情况下,pH值会发生较为明显的变化。对水质pH值进行测定,能够对水质情况进行检验。本文以pH值测定水环境的标准方法为主要研究对象,着重对在新标准方法提出的背景下,新旧标准方法在测定pH值过程中的差异进行了研究和分析。In the monitoring of ecological environment quality,the monitoring of water quality environment is a very important content.The health of the water quality environment will directly affect the quality safety of water resources.When the water quality environment is polluted,the pH value will change significantly.Through the determination of pH value of water quality,the water quality can be tested.In this paper,the standard method for pH value determination of water environment is the main research object,and the difference between the old and new standard methods in the process of pH value determination is studied and analyzed in the context of introducing new standard method.
分 类 号:X52[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120